Catalina Hluz Lopez et al v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. et al
Plaintiff: Catalina Hluz Lopez and Jorge Lopez
Defendant: Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2023cv01604
Filed: August 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2023 Filing 16 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Not Held)/STATUS CONFERENCE before Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court sets an Order to Show Cause Hearing for 10/16/2023 at 9:00 AM., to determine why the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response is due on or before 10/10/2023. The Scheduling Conference is continued to 10/16/2023 at 9:00 AM. Court Reporter: Marea Woolrich. (jp)
September 26, 2023 Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10-12 Court Days, filed by Defendant Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Warren, Marissa)
September 25, 2023 Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan DEFENDANT'S REPORT ; estimated length of trial 10-12 Court Days, filed by Defendant Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Warren, Marissa)
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/25/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 10/2/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
August 25, 2023 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant, Garfield Beach CVS, LLC Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C..(Hopps, Joshua)
August 23, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice (Other) #5 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. (2) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Proof of Service (Subsequent Document) - under Category - Service of Subsequent Document Filings.(3) Notice (Other) event utilized in docketing this filing. Counsel shall use the SEARCH function on the CM/ECF toolbar for events if you are unsure of the events to use. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
August 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
August 22, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other), #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening). You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
August 22, 2023 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
August 22, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 22, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge R. Gary Klausner. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-01604 RGK (KKx). (ghap)
August 21, 2023 Filing 5 Notice filed by Defendant, Garfield Beach CVS, LLC GARFIELD BEACH CVS, L.L.C., a Rhode Island limited liability company. (Hopps, Joshua)
August 18, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 100, Inclusive, Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C., filed by plaintiffs Catalina Hluz Lopez, Jorge Lopez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/10/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
August 18, 2023 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant GARFIELD BEACH CVS, L.L.C., a Rhode Island limited liability company. (Hopps, Joshua)
August 18, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant: Garfield Beach CVS, LLC GARFIELD BEACH CVS, L.L.C., a Rhode Island limited liability company, (Attorney Joshua S Hopps added to party GARFIELD BEACH CVS, L.L.C., a Rhode Island limited liability company(pty:dft))(Hopps, Joshua)
August 18, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL FILED AS Notice filed by Defendant, ACACDC-35884129 Garfield Beach CVS, LLC GARFIELD BEACH CVS, L.L.C., a Rhode Island limited liability company. Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Documents, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - CVS Pharmacy, #4 Declaration Declaration of Attorney, #5 Declaration Declaration of Melanie)(Hopps, Joshua) Modified on 8/22/2023 (ghap). Modified on 8/22/2023 (ghap).
August 16, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Catalina Hluz Lopez et al v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catalina Hluz Lopez
Represented By: Garrett R Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Lopez
Represented By: Garrett R Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C.
Represented By: Marissa Ann Warren
Represented By: Joshua S Hopps
Represented By: Merna Abdelmalak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?