Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd v. B612 Tima Inc et al
Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd. |
B612 Tima Inc, Best Bay Logistics Inc., Rail Dog Trucking LLC and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive |
5:2023cv01628 |
August 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 REPLY In support or Motion to Dismiss NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #9 filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration A. Kleiner Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A (emails), #3 Declaration J. Baratta Declaration)(Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice (Other) #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
Filing 19 Notice Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd.. (Leviton, Stuart) |
Filing 18 REPLY Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #12 Request for Judicial Notice No. 2 filed by Plaintiff Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd.. (Leviton, Stuart) |
Filing 17 PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT BEST BAYS MOTION TO DISMISS; DECLARATION OF STUART L. LEVITON IN SUPPORT THEREOF opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #9 filed by Plaintiff Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd.. (Leviton, Stuart) |
Filing 16 ORDER TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY #11 by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc. ("Defendant") may appear remotely via Zoom at the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss currently scheduled for October 16, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., or any date as the court may set. Further, all parties may appear remotely via Zoom. Counsel are directed to the Court's website to obtain the Zoom link. (rolm) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal re: MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #9 . The hearing on the Motion is CONTINUED from 10/2/2023 to 10/16/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 14 Notice Defendant's Notice of Plaintiff's Non-Opposition to Best Bay Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #12 filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd.. Motion set for hearing on 10/16/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Leviton, Stuart) |
Filing 11 REQUEST for Leave of Andrew B. Kleiner to Appear for telephonic appearance at 10/2/23 hearing on Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EX 1 - Order to Appear Telephonically) (Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. The Court on its own motion sets a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss Complaint #9 on October 2, 2023, 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant Best Bay Logistics, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)) (Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants B612 Tima Inc, Best Bay Logistics Inc., Does 1 through 25, Inclusive, Rail Dog Trucking LLC., filed by plaintiff Fast Post Shanghai Logistics Co., Ltd. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/5/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc., identifying Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 3 Notice of Related Cases Pursuant to Local Rule 83-1.3.1 filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Kleiner, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from CIV-SB-2315023, case number CIV-SB-2315023 Receipt No: ACACDC-35842886 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Best Bay Logistics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EX A - Summons, #2 Exhibit EX B - Complaint) (Attorney Andrew B Kleiner added to party Best Bay Logistics Inc.(pty:dft))(Kleiner, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.