Mario Nunez et al v. ATS Specialized, Inc. et al
| Mario Nunez and Juan Nunez |
| ATS Specialized, Inc., Anderson Trucking Services, Inc., Mark Anthony Lombardo and Does 1 to 100 |
| 5:2023cv01703 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for discovery. Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Christina A. Snyder. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-01703 CAS (MRWx). (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Michael R. Wilner. New Case Number 5:23-cv-1703 CAS (MRWx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants ATS Specialized, Inc., Anderson Trucking Services, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/18/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants ATS Specialized, Inc., Anderson Trucking Services, Inc., Does 1 to 100, Mark Anthony Lombardo. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Mario Nunez, Juan Nunez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/8/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendants ATS Specialized, Inc. and Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. ATS Specialized, Inc., Anderson Trucking Services, Inc... (Brauns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants ATS Specialized, Inc., Anderson Trucking Services, Inc. identifying N/A as Corporate Parent. (Brauns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Nicholas D. Brauns re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants ATS Specialized, Inc., Anderson Trucking Services, Inc.. (Brauns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants ATS Specialized, Inc., Anderson Trucking Services, Inc.. (Brauns, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside, case number CVRI2302945 Receipt No: ACACDC-35891753 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Anderson Trucking Services, Inc., ATS Specialized, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service) (Attorney Nicholas Dmitri Brauns added to party ATS Specialized, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas Dmitri Brauns added to party Anderson Trucking Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Brauns, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
