Guri Gonzalez v. Marlene Caudill
| Guri Gonzalez |
| Marlene Caudill and Does 1 to 10 |
| 5:2023cv01726 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Marlene Caudill. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35925650 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Guri Gonzalez. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Guri Gonzalez(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
