Deanna Washington v. Social Security Administration
Deanna Washington |
Social Security Administration |
5:2023cv01776 |
August 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV23-1776 JPR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Social Security Administration. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 Initial DISCLOSURE of conflict re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held #8 filed by Plaintiff Deanna Washington (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) CASE-MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . See document for details and deadlines. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Non-Prisoner Case). (gk) |
Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Deanna Washington. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Deanna Washington. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Deanna Washington, (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Deanna Washington. (Monge, Troy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Deanna Washington. (Attorney Troy Dana Monge added to party Deanna Washington(pty:pla))(Monge, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Deanna Washington v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deanna Washington | |
Represented By: | Troy Dana Monge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Jennifer Lee Tarn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.