Lisa Childress v. Ford Motor Company et al
Lisa Childress |
Ford Motor Company, Does 1-100, inclusive and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
5:2023cv01949 |
September 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from December 15, 2023 to after May 13, 2024 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cooney, Megan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Neil Larsen on behalf of Plaintiff Lisa Childress (Attorney Neil Larsen added to party Lisa Childress(pty:pla))(Larsen, Neil) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 12/15/2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (cla) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 served on October 4, 2023. (Smith, Katherine) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-01949 JWH (SHKx). (lh) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Lisa Childress. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/20/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, re Notice of Related Case(s) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 served on September 22, 2023. (Smith, Katherine) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Smith, Katherine) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Entities filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company identifying Ford Motor Company as Corporate Parent. (Smith, Katherine) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Smith, Katherine) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVSB2316694 Receipt No: ACACDC-36093600 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dharanidharan Subramaniam in Support of Removal, #2 Declaration of Katherine V.A. Smith in Support of Removal, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G) (Attorney Katherine V. A. Smith added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Smith, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.