Xiuzhen Chen v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Xiuzhen Chen |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and David Radel |
| 5:2023cv01999 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Defendant David Radel, #2 Summons as to Defendant Merrick Garland, #3 Summons)(lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Xiuzhen Chen, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel. Case assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Filing Fee $402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Xiuzhen Chen. (Additional attachment(s): #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
