Jane DK Doe v. Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
Jane DK Doe |
Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Does 1 to 50, Inclusive |
5:2023cv02004 |
September 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
kenly kiya kato |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jane DK Doe, identifying JANE DK DOE, JOHN JK DOE. (Treger, Andrew) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Scheduling Conference set for 1/5/2024 at 01:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lisa Dearden Trepanier counsel for Defendants Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Neda Cate is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Trepanier, Lisa) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.(Trepanier, Lisa) |
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
Filing 4 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Trepanier, Lisa) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Does 1 to 50, Inclusive, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Jane DK Doe. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/7/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 #1 . (et) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties identifying The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Attorney Lisa Dearden Trepanier added to party Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints(pty:dft))(Trepanier, Lisa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Trepanier, Lisa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI2304710 Receipt No: ACACDC-36140230 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lisa Dearden Trepanier in Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint CVRI2304710, #3 Exhibit B - Perpetrator Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Letter re Settlement Demand, #5 Exhibit D - Notice to Clerk of Superior Court of Removal, #6 Exhibit E - Notice to Adverse Party of Removal) (Attorney Lisa Dearden Trepanier added to party The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints(pty:dft))(Trepanier, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jane DK Doe v. Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jane DK Doe | |
Represented By: | Tracy Baer |
Represented By: | Andrew L Treger |
Represented By: | Eric G Rudin |
Represented By: | Wesley J Krieger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints | |
Represented By: | Lisa Dearden Trepanier |
Represented By: | Karl N Haws |
Represented By: | Neda Cate |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints | |
Represented By: | Lisa Dearden Trepanier |
Represented By: | Karl N Haws |
Represented By: | Neda Cate |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Does 1 to 50, Inclusive | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.