Valerie Guadalupe Ordonez et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
| VALERIE ORDONEZ, ANTONIO ORDONEZ and Valerie Guadalupe Ordonez |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP, INC., Costco Wholesale Membership Inc., Does 1 to 100 and Rick Battistoni |
| 5:2023cv02018 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| kenly kiya kato |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP, INC., identifying Valerie Ordonez; Antonio Ordonez; Costco Wholesale Corporation; Costco Wholesale Membership, Inc.. (Flock, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP, INC.. (Flock, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2306516 Receipt No: ACACDC-36151282 - Fee: $402, filed by defendants COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Attorney John K Flock added to party COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION(pty:dft), Attorney John K Flock added to party COSTCO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP, INC.(pty:dft))(Flock, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
