State National Insurance Company v. Michael Murphy et al
State National Insurance Company |
Michael Murphy, Pretty Faces, LLC and Does 1-10 |
5:2023cv02030 |
October 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
kenly kiya kato |
Josephine L Staton |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING Case for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court DISMISSES this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See document for further information). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (gga) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff State National Insurance Companyto Order to Show Cause,, #10 (Tolson, Catharine) |
Filing 10 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Subject-Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause in writing no later than seven (7) days from the date of this Order why the coverage-limit is the relevant benchmark for determining the amount in controversy in an action seeking to rescind a property-insurance or general liability policy. Defendants have seven (7) days thereafter to submit any response. No further briefing will be allowed. Each side's briefing shall not exceed five (5) pages. Following submission of the briefing, the matter will be deemed under submission and the Court will thereafter issue an order. (jp) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges. (identical case) by Judge Percy Anderson, Case Management and Assignment Committee Chair. Case transferred to the calendar of Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. All discovery matters are transferred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Case number now reads as 5:23-cv-02030 JLS(KKx). (rn) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendants Michael Murphy, Pretty Faces, LLC. (car) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by plaintiff State National Insurance Company. (Tolson, Catharine) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff State National Insurance Company identifying State National Intermediate Holdings, Inc.; T.B.A Insurance Group, Ltd.; State National Companies, Inc.; Markel Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Tolson, Catharine) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff State National Insurance Company. (Tolson, Catharine) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36164917 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff State National Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C to Complaint, #4 Exhibit D to Complaint, #5 Exhibit E to Complaint, #6 Exhibit F to Complaint, #7 Exhibit G to Complaint, #8 Exhibit H to Complaint, #9 Exhibit I to Complaint) (Attorney Catharine Michelle Tolson added to party State National Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Tolson, Catharine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.