Dennis Cooper v. Gaby's Latin Flavors, Inc et al
| Dennis Cooper |
| Gaby's Latin Flavors, Inc, Javier Delgado and Does 1 to 10 |
| 5:2023cv02046 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Hernan D Vera |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Hernan D. Vera. Having considered Plaintiff's response, [Dkt. No. 11], the Court finds that exercise of supplemental jurisdiction is not warranted. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act and related state law claims. The Court therefore dismisses these claims without prejudice. (lom)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Gaby's Latin Flavors, Inc answer now due 12/27/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Gaby's Latin Flavors, Inc.(Attorney Hector Hsu added to party Gaby's Latin Flavors, Inc(pty:dft))(Hsu, Hector) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dennis Cooper, upon Defendant Gaby's Latin Flavors, Inc served on 11/5/2023, answer due 11/27/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon EILEEN C. DOWNING, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Dennis Cooperto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Hernan D. Vera: Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause in ten (10) days. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1367(c). (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Javier Delgado, Gaby's Latin Flavors, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Hernan D. Vera and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Dennis Cooper. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dennis Cooper. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-36180240 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Dennis Cooper(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
