Gregory Echols et al v. Department Of Homeland Security et al
| Gregory Echols and Jeannie Echols |
| Luis Gerardo Carmona, Jr., Department of Homeland Security and Does 1 to 100 inclusive |
| 5:2023cv02088 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before December 20, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to Defendant Luis Gerardo Carmona, Jr. This Order to Show Cause will be discharged if Plaintiff files, before the deadline set forth above, a request for the entry of default with respect to the applicable Defendant(s). (lc) Modified on 12/7/2023 (lc).
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gregory Echols, Jeannie Echols, upon Defendant Department of Homeland Security served on 10/24/2023, answer due 12/26/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Front Desk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Front Desk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Registered Mail Receipts)(Bledsoe, Vincent) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gregory Echols, Jeannie Echols, upon Defendant Luis Gerardo Carmona, Jr. served on 10/26/2023, answer due 11/16/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Luis Gerardo Carmona, Jr., Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Bledsoe, Vincent) |
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Luis Gerardo Carmona, Jr., Department of Homeland Security, Does. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Gregory Echols, Jeannie Echols. (Bledsoe, Vincent) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Gregory Echols, Jeannie Echols, (Bledsoe, Vincent) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Gregory Echols, Jeannie Echols. (Bledsoe, Vincent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36211977 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Gregory Echols, Jeannie Echols. (Attorney Vincent Joseph Bledsoe added to party Gregory Echols(pty:pla), Attorney Vincent Joseph Bledsoe added to party Jeannie Echols(pty:pla))(Bledsoe, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
