Hector Gutierrez v. City of Riverside et al
| Hector Gutierrez |
| City of Riverside, Riverside Police Department and Does 1-20 inclusive |
| 5:2023cv02134 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING SCREENING IN PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, re: Amended Complaint #8 . Until the Complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, Plaintiff may not proceed with service of process on any Defendant. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #9 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) #10 : This notice was docketed inadvertently in the wrong case. (lc) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Hector Gutierrez. (hr) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Riverside, Does, Riverside Police Department, amending Complaint #1 , filed by Plaintiff Hector Gutierrez(hr) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical Re: Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #5 : Incorrect pdf document from another case was erroneously attached and Not applicable to this case.Order was redocketed as docket no. #6 . (lc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The party who submitted the rquest has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: Plaintiff did not provide a complete answer to Questions l(b) and 6. As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because: The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted #2 . Within 30 days of the date o f this Order, the filer must do the following:Plaintiff must file an amended request to proceed in forma pauperis and amended complaint. (lc) Modified on 10/26/2023 (lc). Modified on 10/26/2023 (lc).
|
|
Filing 5
(SEE CLERICAL ERROR DOCKET NO. 7- INCORRECT PDF DOCUMENT ATTACHED AND ORDER WAS REDOCKETED AS DOCKET NO. 6). ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The party who submitted the request has not submitted enough information for the Court to tell if the filer is able to pay the filing fees. This is what is missing: Plaintiff did not provide a complete answer to Questions l(b) and 6. As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because: The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted #2 . Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the filer must do the following:Plaintiff must file an amended request to proceed in forma pauperis and amended complaint. (lc) Modified on 10/26/2023 (lc).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hector Gutierrez. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Hector Gutierrez. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants City of Riverside, Does, Riverside Police Department Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar., filed by plaintiff Hector Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
