Kyler Russell v. Starbucks Corporation et al
| Kyler Russell |
| Starbucks Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv02209 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Christina A Snyder |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kyler Russell. (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kyler Russell, (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kyler Russell. (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36305805 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Kyler Russell. (Attorney Apemwoyah Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo added to party Kyler Russell(pty:pla))(Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
