Agustin Almazan Jr v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Agustin Almazan Jr
Defendant: United States of America and DOES 1-25, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2023cv02241
Filed: October 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2023 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Agustin Almazan Jr, upon Defendant United States of America served on 12/8/2023, answer due 2/6/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Unknown. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Larsen, Brian)
November 6, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney Agustin Almazan Jr, (Larsen, Brian)
November 1, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil)
November 1, 2023 Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (jtil)
November 1, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil)
October 31, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Attorney Agustin Almazan Jr. (Larsen, Brian)
October 31, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Agustin Almazan Jr. (Larsen, Brian)
October 31, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36322841 - Fee: $402, filed by Attorney Agustin Almazan Jr. (Attorney Brian Leroy Larsen added to party Agustin Almazan Jr(pty:pla))(Larsen, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Agustin Almazan Jr v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Agustin Almazan Jr
Represented By: Brian Leroy Larsen
Represented By: Joseph Lee
Represented By: Marven Masihi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?