Raul Uriarte-Limon v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. et al
| Raul Uriarte-Limon |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Outparcel Investment Partners III LLC and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2023cv02414 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Outparcel Investment Partners III LLC.(Vukovich, Danielle) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Outparcel Investment Partners III LLC answer now due 1/25/2024; Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. answer now due 1/25/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Outparcel Investment Partners III LLC; Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc..(Attorney Danielle Jasmine Vukovich added to party Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Danielle Jasmine Vukovich added to party Outparcel Investment Partners III LLC(pty:dft))(Vukovich, Danielle) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, upon Defendant Outparcel Investment Partners III LLC served on 12/5/2023, answer due 12/26/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alex Jenkins - Agent for CSC in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, upon Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. served on 12/5/2023, answer due 12/26/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alex Jenkins - Agent for CSC in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Valenti, Matt) |
Filing 11
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Outparcel Investment Partners III LLC. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36480432 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Attorney Matt D Valenti added to party Raul Uriarte-Limon(pty:pla))(Valenti, Matt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
