Anette McElrath v. PeopleReady, Inc. et al
| Anette McElrath |
| PeopleReady, Inc., Parts Authority, LLC and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv02430 |
| November 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 2/5/2024 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (pk)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (pk)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for discovery. Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Dale S. Fischer. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-02430 DSF (MAAx). (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Parts Authority, LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Parts Authority, LLC, PeopleReady, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Anette McElrath. (FILED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/3/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Parts Authority, LLC. (Siegel, Adam) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Parts Authority, LLC identifying PAI Holdco, Inc., a Delaware Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Siegel, Adam) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Parts Authority, LLC, identifying Parts Authority, LLC, PeopleReady, Inc., and Anette McElrath. (Siegel, Adam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVSB2315016 Receipt No: BCACDC-36487982 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Parts Authority, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Adam Y. Siegel in support of defendant Parts Authority, LLC's notice of removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibits, #3 Declaration Declaration of Kim Greenfield in support of defendant Parts Authority, LLC's removal) (Attorney Adam Yuda Siegel added to party Parts Authority, LLC (pty:dft))(Siegel, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
