Eric Lamont Johnson v. United States of America et al
| Eric Lamont Johnson |
| United States of America and James B. Hicks |
| 5:2023cv02542 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to amend. On or before March 3, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") that attempts to remedy the identified defects. [SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.] (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 of 2, #2 Attachment 2 of 2) (es)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION (DKT. 8) by Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin: On December 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to respond to the Court's Order. (Dkt. 8.) Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff an extension of thirty (30) days to February 9, 2024. Granting #8 REQUEST for Extension of Time. [See document for further information.] (es)
|
| Filing 10 Showing of Cause Pursuant to Order to the Court #6 filed by Plaintiff Eric Lamont Johnson(es) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST for Extension of Time to Comply with the Courts Order to Show Cause filed by Plaintiff Eric Lamont Johnson. (es) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REDACTION (DKT. 3) by Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin: denying #3 REQUEST for Order. However, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(h) "a person waives the protection of Rule 5.2(a) as to the person's own information by filing it without redaction and not under seal." Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2.(h). Thus, to the extent Plaintiff filed any of his own information without redaction and now seeks to redact it under Rule 5.2(a) that request is DENIED as waived. Moreover, the Court finds no basis under the Federal Rules or the Local Rules to redact Plaintiff's mailing address, email address, or phone number as that information is not confidential. Indeed, Local Rule 5-4.8 requires pro se litigants to provide both the Court and all parties to the case with their current mailing address, telephone number, and email address for purposes of receiving filings in the case. Thus, the information Plaintiff seeks to redact is required by the Local Rules. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COMPLAINT (DKT. 1) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. Plaintiff therefore is ordered to show cause, no later than January 15, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiff is advised that his failure to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause, or his failure to show why his action is not time-barred, will result in the Court recommending that the action be dismissed. See minute order for details. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (lom) Modified on 12/15/2023 (lom).
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF LAWSUIT AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS filed by Plaintiff Eric Lamont Johnson. (et) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR REDACTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION FROM THE RECORD filed by Plaintiff Eric Lamont Johnson. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Eric Lamont Johnson. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants James B. Hicks, United States of America Case assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (Filing fee $ 405 PAID.) , filed by Plaintiff Eric Lamont Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
