Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
| Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan |
| Allstate Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10 inclusive |
| 5:2023cv02557 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2 days, filed by Plaintiff Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan.. (Rice, Jamie) |
| Filing 17 REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino County #14 filed by Plaintiff Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF JAMIE L. RICE SUPPORTING FOREMOSTS REPLY BRIEF SUPPORTING ITS REMAND MOTION, #2 Proposed Order (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGANS MOTION TO REMAND)(Rice, Jamie) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino County #14 filed by Defendant Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Ha Eun Cho, #2 Proposed Order)(Cho, Ha) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino County #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: No proposed order submitted with the motion In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino County filed by Plaintiff Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan. Motion set for hearing on 2/16/2024 at 02:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF JAMIE L. RICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REMAND, #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF GRACEANNA RAMIREZ IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR REMAND, #3 Memorandum MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REMAND) (Rice, Jamie) |
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Scheduling Conference set for 2/16/2024 at 01:00 PM before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice (Other) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Service Documents Service of Subsequent Document Filings - Select - Proof of Service (subsequent documents). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
|
Filing 11
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 10 Notice of Service of Documents filed by Defendant Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Cho, Ha) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by defendant Allstate Insurance Company.(Feeley, John) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (sh) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ha Eun Cho counsel for Defendant Allstate Insurance Company. Adding Ha Eun Cho as counsel of record for Allstate Insurance Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Allstate Insurance Company. (Attorney Ha Eun Cho added to party Allstate Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Cho, Ha) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney John Edward Feeley counsel for Defendant Allstate Insurance Company. Adding John E. Feeley as counsel of record for Allstate Insurance Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Allstate Insurance Company. (Feeley, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Allstate Insurance Company, identifying Allstate Insurance Holdings, LLC; and The Allstate Corporation. (Feeley, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Allstate Insurance Company. (Feeley, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2326864 Receipt No: ACACDC-36576745 - Fee: $405, filed by defendant Allstate Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration June Cliff) (Attorney John Edward Feeley added to party Allstate Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Feeley, John) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Allstate Insurance Company, Does., filed by Plaintiff Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan.[FILED IN STATE COURT 10/26/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
