Ryan Strilaeff et al v. Thomas A. Jenkins et al
Ryan Strilaeff and Dyonne Strilaeff |
Thomas A. Jenkins, Carole Jenkins, Thomas J. Jenkins and Does 1 through 10 inclusive |
5:2023cv02585 |
December 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a) or (c) without prejudice filed by defendant Thomas J. Jenkins. (twdb) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Thomas J. Jenkins. (ghap) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court State of CA County of San Bernardino, case number LLTVA2301999 with copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Shashi H Kewalramani. Filing fee $402:PAID, filed by Defendant Thomas J. Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.