Jonathan Cruz v. City of Hermosa Beach et al
| Jonathan Cruz |
| City of Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Beach Police Department and Does 1-100, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv02593 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| David T Bristow |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Hermosa Beach answer now due 2/28/2024; Hermosa Beach Police Department answer now due 2/28/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants City of Hermosa Beach; Hermosa Beach Police Department.(Bryans, Natalie) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Natalie P. Bryans counsel for Defendants City of Hermosa Beach, Hermosa Beach Police Department. Adding Jennifer M. Misetich, Natalie P. Bryans, Adam P. Smith as counsel of record for City of Hermosa Beach; Hermosa Beach Police Department for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants City of Hermosa Beach; Hermosa Beach Police Department. (Attorney Natalie P. Bryans added to party City of Hermosa Beach(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie P. Bryans added to party Hermosa Beach Police Department(pty:dft))(Bryans, Natalie) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jonathan Cruz, upon Defendant City of Hermosa Beach served on 1/24/2024, answer due 2/14/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Process Server in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Peffer, Michael) |
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant City of Hermosa Beach. (lom) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jonathan Cruz. (Peffer, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Cruz. (Peffer, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Jonathan Cruz, identifying City of Hermosa Beach. (Peffer, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jonathan Cruz. (Peffer, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36608063 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Jonathan Cruz. (Attorney Michael J Peffer added to party Jonathan Cruz(pty:pla))(Peffer, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
