Stratton Design Build, LLC v. Hilo Enterprises, LLC
| Stratton Design Build, LLC |
| Hilo Enterprises, LLC |
| 5:2023cv02613 |
| December 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| David T Bristow |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Stratton Design Build, LLC, upon Defendant Hilo Enterprises, LLC served on 1/2/2024, answer due 1/23/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ikea Pierre, Agent (Authorized to Accept Service for Legalinc Corporate Services) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service (Pinto, Richard) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Duplicate filing of Complaint. In addition, attachment 2 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. Attachment 4 Notice of Interested Parties should be e-filed separately. The event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Notices. Attachment 3 Summons has now been issued, in the future Summons should be e-filed separately and under its own event. (car) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hilo Enterprises, LLC. (car) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (car) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($405 paid on 12/22/2023,, filed by Plaintiff Stratton Design Build, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Notice of Interested Parties)(Pinto, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36623901 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Stratton Design Build, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Richard J Pinto, II added to party Stratton Design Build, LLC(pty:pla))(Pinto, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stratton Design Build, LLC v. Hilo Enterprises, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stratton Design Build, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Richard J Pinto, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hilo Enterprises, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
