James Fierro v. Travel and Leisure Co. et al
James Fierro |
Otis Elevator Company, Travel and Leisure Co., Worldmark by Wyndham, Otis Elevator Company, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
5:2023cv02629 |
December 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:23-cv-02504-JWH-DFMx. (car) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel James Kelly counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Daniel J. Kelly as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Attorney Daniel James Kelly added to party Otis Elevator Company(pty:dft))(Kelly, Daniel) |
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Valeria Golodnitska counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Valeria Golodnitska as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Anthony Dean Brosamle counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Anthony D. Brosamle as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY. (Attorney Anthony Dean Brosamle added to party Otis Elevator Company(pty:dft))(Brosamle, Anthony) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company, re Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ANTHONY D. BROSAMLE, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DANIEL J. KELLY served on December 27, 2023. (Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Valeria Golodnitska counsel for Defendant Otis Elevator Company. Adding Valeria Golodnitska as counsel of record for Otis Elevator Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by DEFENDANT OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY. (Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Filing 4 DEFENDANT OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANYS CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company, identifying Otis Worldwide Corporation. (Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of 5:23-cv-2629 re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANYS NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court Case, case number 30-2023-01354252-CU-PO-NJC Receipt No: ACACDC-36637109 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Attorney Valeria Golodnitska added to party Otis Elevator Company(pty:dft))(Golodnitska, Valeria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.