Michael Lee Levine v. Martin O'Malley
| Michael Lee Levine |
| Martin O'Malley |
| 5:2024cv00001 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| George H Wu |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
(IN CHAMBERS Order) by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) (TEXT ONLY ENTRY). (RAO)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV24-00001 RAO on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Michael Lee Levine. (Shapiro, Brian) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge George H Wu. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge George H Wu to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:24-cv-00001 FLA(RAO). (rn)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael Lee Levine, (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael Lee Levine. (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Michael Lee Levine. (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Michael Lee Levine. (Attorney Brian C Shapiro added to party Michael Lee Levine(pty:pla))(Shapiro, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael Lee Levine v. Martin O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Lee Levine | |
| Represented By: | Brian C Shapiro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Lee Tarn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
