Misty Pacheco v. Abbott Laboratories et al
| Misty Pacheco |
| Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson & Company LLC, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Mead Johnson and Company LLC |
| 5:2024cv00069 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Northern District of Illinois, 1:24-cv-00861 filed 2/6/2024. (rolm) |
| Filing 10 Conditional Transfer Order - CTO-55 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3026, transferring case to USDC, Northern District of Illinois and assigned to Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Case transferred electronically. (rolm) |
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER TO IN RE PRETERM INFANT NUTRITION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, MDL NO. 3026 by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Parties' request for a stay of all proceedings is GRANTED; 2. All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed for all purposes pending the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's final decision to transfer this action to In re Abbott Laboratories, et al., Preterm Infant Nutrition Products Liability Litigation, MDL 3026; and 3. All pending dates and deadlines are hereby vacated. (See document for further information) [NOTE CHANGES BY COURT]. (aco)
|
| Filing 7 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Transfer to MDL 3026 filed by Defendant Abbott Laboratories. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Zeng, Catherine) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, Mead Johnson and Company LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Misty Pacheco. (FILED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/11/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Abbott Laboratories, (Zeng, Catherine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Abbott Laboratories. (Attachments: #1 Addendum Regarding Related Cases)(Zeng, Catherine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2306641 Receipt No: ACACDC-36719793 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Abbott Laboratories. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Catherine T. Zeng in Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Notice of Department Assignment, #6 Exhibit Notice of Case Management Conference, #7 Exhibit Certificate of Counsel, #8 Exhibit Notice of Document Quality Assurance, #9 Exhibit Riverside Superior Court Online Docket) (Attorney Catherine Tara Zeng added to party Abbott Laboratories(pty:dft))(Zeng, Catherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
