Jose PePe Mitchell v. J. Skeleton
| Jose PePe Mitchell |
| J. Skeleton |
| 5:2024cv00104 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Karen E Scott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INMATE STATEMENT REPORT filed by Plaintiff Jose PePe Mitchell re: REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jose PePe Mitchell. CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Mens Colony (CMC) in San Luis Obispo is DIRECTED to submit a certified Prison Trust Account Statement for Jose PePe Mitchell CDC BC-7067 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. #4 (es) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jose PePe Mitchell. CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Mens Colony (CMC) in San Luis Obispo is DIRECTED to submit a certified Prison Trust Account Statement for Jose PePe Mitchell CDC BC-7067 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account Statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified Prison Trust Account Statement in pdf format to PrisonerFilings_CACD@cacd.uscourts.gov with the case number and inmate name in the subject line as reflected on this notification.(es) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 Notice Re: Discrepancies in Filing of Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint (CV-93P). Upon submission of your civil rights complaint, it was noted that you did not pay the appropriate filing fee. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you must sign and complete the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support form (CV-60P) attached. You may return your fee waiver and/or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your action may be dismissed. Re: Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 . (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendant J. Skeleton pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E Scott., filed by plaintiff Jose PePe Mitchell. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jose PePe Mitchell v. J. Skeleton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jose PePe Mitchell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J. Skeleton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
