Nelson Chilin v. Redhill Coffee Shop et al
| Nelson Chilin |
| Redhill Coffee Shop, A&E 556 LLC and A and E 556 LLC |
| 5:2024cv00159 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nelson Chilin, upon Defendant Redhill Coffee Shop served on 2/12/2024, answer due 3/4/2024. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to A and E 556 LLC answer now due 3/29/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant A and E 556 LLC.(Attorney Yosef Peretz added to party A and E 556 LLC(pty:dft))(Peretz, Yosef) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nelson Chilin, upon Defendant A and E 556 LLC served on 2/9/2024, answer due 3/1/2024. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S CALIFORNIA STATE LAW CLAIMS (Dkt. #11 ). The Court hereby VACATES the OSC hearing set for February 16, 2024. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Nelson Chilinto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Order to Show Cause,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes:, (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than February 9, 2024. The Court sets a hearing date regarding this Order to Show Cause on February 16, 2024, at 1:00 PM via zoom. Plaintiffs failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and related state claims and dismissing the claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants A and E 556 LLC, Redhill Coffee Shop. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Nelson Chilin. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nelson Chilin. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36787080 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Nelson Chilin(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
