Gilbert Noriega v. County of San Bernardino
| Gilbert Noriega |
| County of San Bernardino and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 5:2024cv00170 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Shannon Lin Gustafson counsel for Defendant County of San Bernardino. Adding Shannon L. Gustafson as counsel of record for County of San Bernardino for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant County of San Bernardino. (Attorney Shannon Lin Gustafson added to party County of San Bernardino(pty:dft))(Gustafson, Shannon) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of San Bernardino answer now due 3/28/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant County of San Bernardino.(Attorney Anita Kay Clarke added to party County of San Bernardino(pty:dft))(Clarke, Anita) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Gilbert Noriega, upon Defendant County of San Bernardino served on 2/6/2024, answer due 2/27/2024. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant County of San Bernardino. (et) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (lfa)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (et) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Noriega. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Gilbert Noriega re Successor in Interest to Decedent Jason Noriega filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Noriega. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Noriega, identifying County of San Bernardino. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Noriega.. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Noriega. (Peacock, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-36798657 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Noriega. (Attorney Gregory Paul Peacock added to party Gilbert Noriega(pty:pla))(Peacock, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
