Sophia Lanza v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sophia Lanza
Defendant: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., Frederick Doe and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2024cv00174
Filed: January 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sherilyn Peace Garnett
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CIVIL PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/26/2025 at 3:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Jury Trial set for 3/18/2025 at 8:30 AM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet) (iv)
March 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STANDING ORDER FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (iv)
March 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 1/22/2025. (iv)
March 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the March 6, 2024, Scheduling Conference. Trial Order to be issued. The Joint Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference filed at Dkt. No. #12 is denied as moot and vacated. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 29, 2024 Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from March 6, 2024 to March 19, 2024, STIPULATION for Hearing re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #10 filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue March 6, 2024 Scheduling Conference)(Javier, Kelsey)
February 21, 2024 Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Sophia Lanza.. (Juarez Munoz, Michael)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/21/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/2024 at 03:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
January 31, 2024 Filing 8 Notice of Case Initiating Documents filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Javier, Kelsey)
January 29, 2024 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
January 29, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
January 29, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:24-cv-00174 SPG (SHKx). (ghap)
January 26, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Frederick Doe, Does 1 through 20, inclusive, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Sophia Lanza. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/20/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap)
January 26, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sophia Lanza, upon Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. served on 12/29/2023, answer due 1/19/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sarai Marin-Agent for service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/2/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2) (ghap)
January 26, 2024 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/23/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap)
January 26, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. correcting Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Kahf, Usama)
January 26, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., identifying FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Javier, Kelsey)
January 26, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2325697 with filing fee previously paid ($450.00 paid on 01/26/2024, receipt number 080074), filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2- State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit 3- Answer, #4 Declaration Declaration of Eugene Banks, #5 Declaration Declaration of Usama Kahf, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Javier, Kelsey)
January 26, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2325697 Receipt No: ACACDC-36803826 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2- State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit 3- Answer) (Attorney Kelsey L. Wong Javier added to party FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. (pty:dft))(Javier, Kelsey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sophia Lanza v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sophia Lanza
Represented By: Michael Juarez Munoz
Represented By: Daniel Azizi
Represented By: Liliuokalani Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Represented By: Kelsey L. Wong Javier
Represented By: Usama Kahf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frederick Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?