Raul Uriarte-Limon v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company et al
| Raul Uriarte-Limon |
| The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Roseff LLC, Does 1-10 and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company |
| 5:2024cv00203 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Other Filings Notices - Select - Settlement. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. The Court is in receipt of the Notice of Settlement #18 filed in the above-referenced action, under the wrong category of "Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1))." This is to bring to your attention that the Notice of Settlement does not vacate or continue dates and deadlines. The parties need to make a request, attaching a proposed order, separate from the Notice of Settlement.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Roseff LLC, identifying The Roseff Trust under Trust Agreement dated September 27, 1976; Steven Sandelman; Elyse Sandelman; Tracy Brewer. (Leyel, Christopher) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Roseff LLC answer now due 4/4/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Roseff LLC.(Attorney Christopher P Leyel added to party Roseff LLC(pty:dft))(Leyel, Christopher) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, identifying Black Rock, Inc.; and The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Leyel, Christopher) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company answer now due 3/28/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company.(Attorney Christopher P Leyel added to party The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company(pty:dft))(Leyel, Christopher) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel must refer to the Central Districts website at http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov for Judge Dean D.Pregerson's Procedures and Schedules. Counsel must review the Court's Standing Order and CV Trial Order, and comply with the same. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing a motion. See document for more information. (shb)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, upon Defendant Roseff LLC served on 2/13/2024, answer due 3/5/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alex Gonzales - Client Service Specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, upon Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company served on 2/6/2024, answer due 2/27/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rebecca Vang - person authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Roseff LLC. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Valenti, Matt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36825243 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Attorney Matt D Valenti added to party Raul Uriarte-Limon(pty:pla))(Valenti, Matt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
