Nelson Chilin v. Jyap Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Nelson Chilin
Defendant: Jyap Corp., Domika R. E. Investments, LLC and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 5:2024cv00334
Filed: February 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: Sunshine Suzanne Sykes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff served the summons and complaint on one or more Defendants more than 21 days ago (60 days if the Defendant is the United States), but such Defendant(s) did not file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before April 22, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to each Defendant who has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint. (lom)
March 19, 2024 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nelson Chilin, upon Defendant Jyap Corp. served on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon JEFFERSON YAP, AS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Kim, Jason)
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. For the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action (Unruh Act Claim), Third Cause of Action (California Disabled Persons Act), Fourth Cause of Action (California Health & Safety Code 1995), and Fifth Cause of Action (Negligence). (lom)
February 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") by Judge Sunshine S. Sykes: The Court has received Plaintiff's Response (the "Response") to the Court's OSC issued on February 13, 2024. [Dkt. 9, 11]. In view of the Response, the Court hereby VACATES the OSC hearing set for March 1, 2024. A separate order addressing the matter of supplemental jurisdiction will be issued by the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 23, 2024 Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Nelson Chilinto Order to Show Cause, #9 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason)
February 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
February 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Show Cause Hearing set for 3/1/2024 at 01:00 PM via Zoom, before Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/23/2024. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
February 9, 2024 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Domika R. E. Investments, LLC, Jyap Corp. (et)
February 9, 2024 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
February 9, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
February 9, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et)
February 9, 2024 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Nelson Chilin. (Kim, Jason)
February 9, 2024 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason)
February 9, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nelson Chilin. (Kim, Jason)
February 9, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36890360 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J. Kim added to party Nelson Chilin(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelson Chilin v. Jyap Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nelson Chilin
Represented By: Jason J. Kim
Represented By: Jason T. Yoon
Represented By: Kevin Hyunjong Hong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jyap Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Domika R. E. Investments, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?