Jamil Anglin v. County of Riverside et al
| Jamil Anglin |
| County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff s Department, Chief Chad Bianco, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Edward Delgado, James Krachmer, David Holm and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2024cv00352 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Eugene P Ramirez counsel for Defendants Chad Bianco, County of Riverside, Edward Delgado, David Holm, James Krachmer, Riverside County Sheriff s Department. Adding Eugene P. Ramirez as counsel of record for County of Riverside; Riverside County Sheriff's Department; Sheriff Chad Bianco; Edward Delgado James Krachmer; and David Holm for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants County of Riverside; Riverside County Sheriff's Department; Sheriff Chad Bianco; Edward Delgado; James Krachmer; and David Holm. (Attorney Eugene P Ramirez added to party Chad Bianco(pty:dft), Attorney Eugene P Ramirez added to party County of Riverside(pty:dft), Attorney Eugene P Ramirez added to party Edward Delgado(pty:dft), Attorney Eugene P Ramirez added to party David Holm(pty:dft), Attorney Eugene P Ramirez added to party James Krachmer(pty:dft), Attorney Eugene P Ramirez added to party Riverside County Sheriff s Department(pty:dft))(Ramirez, Eugene) |
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Edward Delgado answer now due 4/25/2024; Riverside County Sheriff s Department answer now due 4/25/2024; James Krachmer answer now due 4/25/2024; County of Riverside answer now due 4/25/2024; David Holm answer now due 4/25/2024; Chad Bianco answer now due 4/25/2024, re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Edward Delgado; Riverside County Sheriff s Department; James Krachmer; County of Riverside; David Holm; Chad Bianco.(Smith, G) |
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Granting Stipulation and Joint Request to Continue Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, (30 days or less) #13 . Extended to 4/5/24. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Edward Delgado, Riverside County Sheriff s Department, James Krachmer, County of Riverside, David Holm, Chad Bianco. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney G Craig Smith added to party Chad Bianco(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party County of Riverside(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party Edward Delgado(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party David Holm(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party James Krachmer(pty:dft), Attorney G Craig Smith added to party Riverside County Sheriff s Department(pty:dft))(Smith, G) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jamil Anglin, upon Defendant Chad Bianco served on 3/4/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Theresa Powell, Clerk of the Board, authorized person to accept service of process on behalf of Sheriff Chad Blanco in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (Richardson, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jamil Anglin, upon Defendant Riverside County Sheriff s Department served on 3/4/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lucy Naphosaysavath, Senior Records Clerk - Authorized person to accept service of process in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (Richardson, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jamil Anglin, upon Defendant County of Riverside served on 3/4/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Clerk of Board, Theresa Powell in compliance with statute not specified by personal service (Richardson, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Chad Bianco, Chad Bianco, County of Riverside, Edward Delgado, David Holm, James Krachmer, Riverside County Sheriff s Department. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jamil Anglin. (Richardson, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jamil Anglin, (Richardson, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jamil Anglin. (Richardson, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36911853 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Jamil Anglin. (Attorney Joseph L Richardson added to party Jamil Anglin(pty:pla))(Richardson, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
