Phillip Maciel v. Riverside County Sheriffs Department et al
| Phillip Maciel |
| Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Ybarra, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
| 5:2024cv00403 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| William D Keller |
| Steve Kim |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES (PRISONER NON-HABEAS CASE), #5 by Judge William D. Keller: The Court has reviewed the Request to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (the "Request") and the documents submitted with it. On the question of Indigency, the court finds that Plaintiff: is not able to pay the full filing fee. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED. Plaintiff now owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00 An initial filing fee of $6.45 is due immediately, this case may be dismissed if that amount is not received by the Court within 30 days. Thereafter, monthly payments must be forwarded to the Court as provided in 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(2). It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $$6.45 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (shb)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Phillip Maciel. (hr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES (PRISONER NON-HABEAS CASE), #2 by Judge William D. Keller: The Court has reviewed the Request to proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees ("the Request") and the documents submitted with it. On the question of indigency, the court finds that Plaintiff: has not submitted enough information for the court to tell if plaintiff is able to prepay the full filing fee. This is what is missing: a certified copy of a trust fund statement for the last six months; a certificate of authorized officer. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED for 30 days so the Plaintiff has the opportunity ti provide the missing information identified above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must do the following: (1) Clarify if he is a prisoner within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Sect 1915(h0; AND (2) Refile a fully completed CV-60P, including the required certificate of authorized officer and certified copy of Plaintiff's prison or jail trust fund statement (or institutional equivalent) for the last six months. (shb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge William D. Keller and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Phillip Maciel. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants John Doe 1(Deputy Sheriff, official capacity), John Doe 1(individual), John Doe 2(individual), John Doe 2(Deputy Sheriff, official capacity), Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Ybarra(individual), Ybarra(Deputy Sheriff, official capacity) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge William D. Keller and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim., filed by plaintiff Phillip Maciel. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
