Vidal Navarro Mendez v. W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc. et al
| Vidal Navarro Mendez |
| W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc. and Stacie Lynn Darden |
| 5:2024cv00503 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kevin P McNamara counsel for Defendants Stacie Lynn Darden, W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc.. Adding Kevin P. McNamara as counsel of record for W.N. MOREHOUSE TRUCK LINE, INC. and STACIE LYNN DARDEN for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants W.N. MOREHOUSE TRUCK LINE, INC. and STACIE LYNN DARDEN. (McNamara, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants All Defendants, (McNamara, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Stacie Lynn Darden, W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc.. (McNamara, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV32037 Receipt No: BCACDC-37051445 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendants Stacie Lynn Darden, W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc.. (Attorney Kevin P McNamara added to party Stacie Lynn Darden(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin P McNamara added to party W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc. (pty:dft))(McNamara, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
