Dan Hong v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Plaintiff: Dan Hong
Defendant: USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Case Number: 5:2024cv00517
Filed: March 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is STAYED until August 5, 2025. By no later than April 1, 2025, and July 1, 2025, the parties shall file Joint Status Reports updating the Court on the status of the immigration proceedings. (rolm)
April 15, 2024 Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Anthony John Messuri added to party USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft))(Messuri, Anthony)
March 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central District's website for additional information. The address is "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov." (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)
March 11, 2024 Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (lh)
March 11, 2024 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
March 11, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh)
March 9, 2024 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dan Hong. (Chen, Michael)
March 9, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dan Hong, identifying None. (Chen, Michael)
March 9, 2024 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Plaintiff Dan Hong., Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dan Hong. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Chen, Michael)
March 9, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37063463 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Dan Hong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Chen added to party Dan Hong(pty:pla))(Chen, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dan Hong v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dan Hong
Represented By: Michael Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Oil Appellate
Represented By: Anthony John Messuri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?