Christopher Dylon Sawyer v. Riverside County et al
Christopher Dylon Sawyer |
Riverside County, Riverside County Sheriff Deparment, Chad Bianco, Dennis Vroom, flakes, Riverside University Health System and DOES 1 thru 10, inclusive |
5:2024cv00518 |
March 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-37188184 for $405 filing fee. (Bond, Royal) |
|
|
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Christopher Dylon Sawyer. (Bond, Royal) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christopher Dylon Sawyer, (Bond, Royal) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Christopher Dylon Sawyer. (Bond, Royal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Dylon Sawyer. (Attorney Royal DL Bond added to party Christopher Dylon Sawyer(pty:pla))(Bond, Royal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.