Nassir Black v. Giant Inland Empire RV Center Inc and its Agents et al
Nassir Black |
Giant Inland Empire RV Center Inc and its Agents, Behzad Borduti, Michael Murphy, Musick, Reeler and Garrett LLP, Michael Kuen and Judge Corey G. Lee |
5:2024cv00523 |
March 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Sheri Pym |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nassir Black. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Nassir Black. (ghap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Behzad Borduti, Giant Inland Empire RV Center Inc and its Agents, Michael Kuen, Corey G. Lee, Michael Murphy, Musick, Reeler and Garrett LLP. Case assigned to Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Nassir Black. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.