8112 Magnolia, LLC v. Eric A. Henrichsen et al

Plaintiff: 8112 Magnolia, LLC
Defendant: Eric A. Henrichsen and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2024cv00572
Filed: March 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T Bristow
Referring Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2024 Filing 10 Receipt of LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT. (aco)
March 21, 2024 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Riverside. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Riverside. (aco)
March 21, 2024 Filing 8 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Riverside for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. (See document for further information). (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco)
March 21, 2024 Filing 7 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because The District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction; removal jurisdiction. This case is REMANDED to state court as explained in the attached statement; denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (aco)
March 20, 2024 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
March 20, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
March 20, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (jtil)
March 18, 2024 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Eric A. Henrichsen. (jtil)
March 18, 2024 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Eric A. Henrichsen. (jtil)
March 18, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, filed by Defendant Eric A. Henrichsen. Case number UDCO2301936 with copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, Discovery to Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 8112 Magnolia, LLC v. Eric A. Henrichsen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 8112 Magnolia, LLC
Represented By: Terence Patrick Carney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric A. Henrichsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?