Whittenberg v. Bureau of Prisons Western Regional Office et al
| Lane Whittenberg |
| Bureau of Prisons Western Regional Office, Dennis M. Wong and USP Victorville Property Officers |
| 5:2024cv00591 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (PRISONER NON-HABEAS CASE). Plaintiff has the ability to prepay the full filing fee. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (sh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Lane Whittenberg. (sh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Bureau of Prisons Western Regional Office, USP Victorville Property Officers, Dennis M. Wong pursuant to Bivens Act. Case assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin.(Filing fee$405), filed by Plaintiff Lane Whittenberg. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
