Aaron Devonne Ruff v. Jeri Caperton et al
| Aaron Ruff |
| Jeri Caperton, Christine Masonek, Ted Beard, Mike Landavazo, San Bernardino County and Does 1-5 |
| 5:2024cv00656 |
| March 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH FILING OF COMPLAINT OR NOTICE OF REMOVAL mailed to Plaintiff Aaron Devonne Ruff. Upon filing of your complaint, the following discrepancy was found: You have not submitted the entire filing fee amount of $ 405. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you may request that the fee be waived. To do so, you must complete, sign, and return the enclose form, Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), in its entirety. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date above, your action will be dismissed or remanded to state court, as appropriate. If your fee waiver request or payment is received within THIRTY DAYS, judges will be assigned to your case. You may return your fee waiver request or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Complaint, #1 (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants (Filing fee $405 Due), filed by Plaintiff Aaron Devonne Ruff. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
