Haocheng William Wang v. CRST Expedited Inc. et al
| HAOCHENG "WILLIAM&q WANG |
| JOANNA J. VELASQUEZ and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, |
| CRST EXPEDITED, INC. an Iowa corporation |
| 5:2024cv00657 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT CRST EXPEDITED, INC. an Iowa corporation, identifying Plaintiff, Haocheng "William" Wang; Defendant, CRST Expedited, Inc.; and Defendant Joanna J. Velasquez. (Okelberry, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant CRST EXPEDITED, INC. an Iowa corporation. (Okelberry, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVSB2332243 Receipt No: ACACDC-37178854 - Fee: $405, filed by DEFENDANT CRST EXPEDITED, INC. an Iowa corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nathan V. Okelberry in Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Emily Taylor in Support of Notice of Removal, #3 State Court Complaint) (Attorney Nathan Vern Okelberry added to party CRST EXPEDITED, INC. an Iowa corporation(pty:bkmov))(Okelberry, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
