Toyin Dawodu v. Experian et al
| Toyin Dawodu |
| Experian, Transunion, Equifax Inc., Credit One Bank, First National Capital Corporation, First Premier Bank, Lending Club, Financial Stability Board, Applied Bank, Capital One, CCS First National Bank, US Bank, State Farm, Credit Management LP, Charter Communications, Spectrum.com and DOES 1-50 |
| 5:2024cv00686 |
| April 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Joinder to Removal filed by defendant Lending Club. (Tasca, Joel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Experian, identifying Experian plc, Central Source LLC, Online Data Exchange LLC, New Management Services LLC, VantageScore Solutions LLC, Opt-Out Services LLC. (Winchel, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Experian. (Winchel, Brandon) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI2400894 Receipt No: ACACDC-37205182 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Experian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H) (Attorney Brandon L. Winchel added to party Experian(pty:dft))(Winchel, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
