Mark Alan Woodend v. Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff: Mark Alan Woodend
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Case Number: 5:2024cv00716
Filed: April 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE (In Chambers) Order Re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: This is governed by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), effective as of December 1, 2022. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (et)
May 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting #2 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (nbo)
April 17, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 5:24-cv-00716-DFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #6 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #7 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (aco)
April 16, 2024 Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin O'Malley. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Martin O'Malley(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer)
April 10, 2024 Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Mark Alan Woodend. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
April 8, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car)
April 5, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mark Alan Woodend, (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
April 5, 2024 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mark Alan Woodend. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
April 5, 2024 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Mark Alan Woodend. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
April 5, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Mark Alan Woodend. (Attorney Lawrence D Rohlfing added to party Mark Alan Woodend(pty:pla))(Rohlfing, Lawrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mark Alan Woodend v. Martin O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Alan Woodend
Represented By: Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Jennifer Lee Tarn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?