Derrick Lee v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
| Derrick Lee |
| Amazon.com Services, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 5:2024cv00846 |
| April 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Account Receivable |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 6/21/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to this Court's General Order in the Matter of Assignment of Cases and Duties to the District Judges, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:24-cv-00846-AB-SHKx. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:24-cv-00846 KK-SHKx. (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC. Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Amazon.com Services, LLC, Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Derrick Lee. Filed in State Court on 3/15/2024 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Related Case(s) #5 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 served on April 18, 2024. (Mills, Jason) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Mills, Jason) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC, identifying Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Sales, Inc.. (Mills, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC identifying Amazon.com, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Mills, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Mills, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2401422 Receipt No: ACACDC-37314006 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer to Complaint, #3 Declaration of Barbara A. Fitzgerald in Support of Removal, #4 Declaration of Zane A. Brown in Support of Removal) (Attorney Jason S Mills added to party Amazon.com Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Mills, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
