Yanan Wang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Yanan Wang |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and David Radel |
| 5:2024cv00889 |
| April 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, David Radel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Yanan Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Shu, Han) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yanan Wang, (Shu, Han) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yanan Wang. (Shu, Han) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37360572 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Yanan Wang. (Attorney Han Shu added to party Yanan Wang(pty:pla))(Shu, Han) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
