David Anthony Dean v. Unknown
| David Anthony Dean |
| Unknown |
| 5:2024cv00973 |
| May 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Otis D Wright |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 Letter Re Habeas Corpus Transfer-In) (sh) |
| Filing 7 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Eastern |
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/7/2024 TRANSFERRING this matter to the US District Court for the Central District of California. CASE TRANSFERRED. (Huang, H) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.]
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Transfer Order served on David Anthony Dean. (Huang, H) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.] |
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT A by David Anthony Dean. (Kyono, V) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.] |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kyono, V) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE re Attorney Misconduct by David Anthony Dean (Kyono, V) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.] |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on David Dean. (Kyono, V) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.] |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 5/28/2024. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kyono, V) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Unknown by David Dean.(Kyono, V) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/10/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: David Anthony Dean v. Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Anthony Dean | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
