Subbarao v. Citibank, N.A. et al
| Pooja Subbarao |
| Citibank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank NA and Prashant Subbarao |
| 5:2024cv01037 |
| May 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Notice to Adverse Parties and State Court of Removal to Federal Court served on May 16, 2024. (Chan, Camilla) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A., identifying Plaintiff Pooja Subbarao, Defendant Citibank, N.A., Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA, Wells Fargo & Company is the parent company of Wells Fargo Bank, NA; and Defendant Prashant Subbarao. (Chan, Camilla) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Chan, Camilla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01362931-CU-CO-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-37482192 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Notice of Case Management Conference, #4 Exhibit 2024.-05-01 Minute Order) (Attorney Camilla Y Chan added to party Citibank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Chan, Camilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
