Alfredo Ramirez et al v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
| Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro |
| AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., John G. Mavredakis, John D. Parks, Neil Brozen, John and Jane Does, The AMPAM Board of Directors and Charles E. Parks, III |
| 5:2024cv01038 |
| May 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 Corrected WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. upon Neil Brozen waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/12/2024, answer due 8/12/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Julian Andre. (Wheeler, Ryan) |
| Filing 26 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. upon John D. Parks waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/12/2024, answer due 8/12/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Sarah Adams. (Wheeler, Ryan) |
| Filing 25 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. upon John G. Mavredakis waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/12/2024, answer due 8/12/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Sarah Adams. (Wheeler, Ryan) |
| Filing 24 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. upon Charles E. Parks, III waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/12/2024, answer due 8/12/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Sarah Adams. (Wheeler, Ryan) |
| Filing 23 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. upon The AMPAM Board of Directors waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/12/2024, answer due 8/12/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Sarah Adams. (Wheeler, Ryan) |
| Filing 22 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. upon Neil Brozen waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/30/2024, answer due 7/29/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Julian Andre. (Wheeler, Ryan) |
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING AMPAM PARKS MECHANICAL, INC.'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The court, having considered the Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS that AMPAM shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or by August 12, 2024. RE: STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer, #20 . (aco)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 12, 2024 filed by Defendants AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., John G. Mavredakis, Charles E. Parks, III, John D. Parks, The AMPAM Board of Directors. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Sean Michael Sullivan added to party AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Sean Michael Sullivan added to party John G. Mavredakis(pty:dft), Attorney Sean Michael Sullivan added to party Charles E. Parks, III(pty:dft), Attorney Sean Michael Sullivan added to party John D. Parks(pty:dft), Attorney Sean Michael Sullivan added to party The AMPAM Board of Directors(pty:dft))(Sullivan, Sean) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez, upon Defendant AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. served on 5/28/2024, answer due 6/18/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nadia Bellamy, Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Wheeler, Ryan) |
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. (aco) |
| Filing 15 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jacob T. Schutz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 5/23/2024, Receipt No. ACACDC-37523078) filed by Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Martin, Shaun) |
| Filing 14 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michelle C. Yau to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 5/23/2024, Receipt No. ACACDC-37521706) filed by Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Martin, Shaun) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow: terminating #11 Non-Resident Attorney Jacob T. Schutz's APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Jacob T. Schutz's Corrected APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro, designating Shaun P. Martin as local counsel. (hr)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow: terminating #10 Non-Resident Attorney Michelle C. Yau's APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Michelle C. Yau's Corrected APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro, designating Shaun P. Martin as local counsel. (hr)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jacob T. Schutz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37523078) #11 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michelle C. Yau to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37521706) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District for the practice of law, in which the attorney is physically present on a regular basis to conduct business. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Please note DJ and MJ Notice of Assignment, dated 5/17/24, Dkt. 4. (lt) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. (Martin, Shaun) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jacob T. Schutz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37523078) filed by Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Martin, Shaun) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michelle C. Yau to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-37521706) filed by Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Martin, Shaun) |
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for further information). (aco)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michelle C. Yau on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jacob T. Schultz on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Martin, Shaun) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. (Martin, Shaun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37483160 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs Ramn Santos Castro, Alfredo Ramirez. (Attorney Shaun P Martin added to party Ramn Santos Castro(pty:pla), Attorney Shaun P Martin added to party Alfredo Ramirez(pty:pla))(Martin, Shaun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
