Javier Estrada Lopez v. Medline Industries, LP et al
| Javier Estrada Lopez |
| Medline Industries, LP, Medline Industries Holdings, L.P. and Medline Industries Inc |
| 5:2024cv01054 |
| May 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Medline Industries, LP, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice (Other) #4 , Notice (Other) #3 served on May 17, 2024. (Kranz, Jannine) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Defendants Medline Industries, LP. (Kranz, Jannine) |
| Filing 3 Notice Of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceeding filed by Defendant Medline Industries, LP. (Kranz, Jannine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Medline Industries, LP. (Kranz, Jannine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVSB2405238 Receipt No: ACACDC-37493337 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Medline Industries, LP. (Attachments: #1 State Complaint, #2 Answer to State Complaint) (Attorney Jannine E Kranz added to party Medline Industries, LP(pty:dft))(Kranz, Jannine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
