Boyuan Liu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Boyuan Liu |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and David Radel |
| 5:2024cv01058 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Sheri Pym |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Boyuan Liu. (et) |
| Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant David Radel. (et) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Merrick Garland. (et) |
| Filing 2 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Civil Process Clerk). (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS against Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel. Case assigned to Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Filing fee $ 405 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Boyuan Liu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
